Which biodiversity credits are worth buying, judged by the rules of the
standard that issues them, not by any single project.
9
standards, scored 1 to 5 on five integrity dimensions.
Each standard is judged on whether its rules, if followed, produce credits that mean what they claim. Click a row for the dimension-by-dimension reading and real-world adoption to date.
| Standard | Type | Metric rigor |
Addition- ality |
Like-for- like |
Permanence & gov. |
Community & equity |
Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading standards... | |||||||
Not crediting standards, but the bodies setting shared definitions and high-integrity principles for the market. Shown as context, not scored.
A standard needs a host country that recognises the unit. This is C-RISK's carbon-and-biodiversity market-policy reading for all 54 African countries. The dimension is combined; the biodiversity-specific signal sits inside each country's note. Higher is more developed.
| Policy | Country | Reading (from C-RISK) |
|---|---|---|
| Loading... | ||
The market's hardest question is whether the nature outcome is real. Canopy already runs an independent satellite measurement series for every protected area it tracks, which is the evidence layer a credit claim can be checked against.
In this release C-BIO rates the standards. As biodiversity-credit projects reach African sites Canopy already monitors, each project rating will carry its own measured series, so a claimed uplift can be read against what the satellites show on the ground. That independent check is the difference between a rating built on documents and one built on evidence. See the PACE protected-area pages for the measurement series in action.