The Canopy Global 1000 ranks the world’s land protected areas by conservation value: how irreplaceable the species they hold are, how connected they are to other protected land, and how intact they are, weighted by size. Plant data is being added to the ranking, so both versions are shown side by side. Neither is the final word.
Without plants, Lorentz ranks 108 of 1,000. With plants it ranks 35. It stays in the top 300 either way, which is why it is here.
Management-effectiveness ratings published outside Canopy, each on its publisher’s own scale. They are not PACE scores, some are self-assessments, and different methods and years are never converted into one another or ranked together.
IUCN World Heritage Outlook: overall protection and management, 2025: Serious Concern. The scale’s categories, in the publisher’s order: Highly Effective, Mostly Effective, Some Concern, Serious Concern.
Assessor: IUCN expert assessment and review process; individual assessor not named on retrieved page. Published overall protection-and-management category, not the conservation-outlook category.
Scale: Protection and management categories. Not the conservation outlook, threat or values scale. Source: IUCN World Heritage Outlook: Lorentz National Park; 2025 assessment, finalised 11 October 2025; Overall PROTECTION and MANAGEMENT. Retrieved 2026-10-05. World Heritage property name and country match the cohort entity, whose WDPA record is the inscribed property; no component score extrapolated.
Indonesian national METT (KSDAE), 2017: 60 percent, on a 0 to 100 scale.
Assessor: Unit self-assessment under Ditjen KSDAE METT guidance, values set by Director General decree; individual assessors not named. Overall Nilai METT only. The archived file is unsigned and its header number is a template leftover, so no decree number is cited; year taken from its title and recital and matched by the 2017 column of the Dit KK 2015 to 2019 effectiveness report.
Scale: Published overall Nilai METT index (Indonesian national METT adaptation) from a Ditjen KSDAE decree annex or an official Ditjen KSDAE statistics or performance report table. Component scores not retained; no conversion to other METT variants. Source: Ditjen KSDAE 2017 management-effectiveness values for 397 conservation areas (unsigned file); Lampiran, row TN Lorentz, column Nilai METT. Retrieved 2026-10-05. Unit name and function (taman nasional (TN)) match the cohort entity in the same province; one row per unit.
Indonesian national METT (KSDAE), 2019: 70 percent, on a 0 to 100 scale.
Assessor: Unit self-assessment under Ditjen KSDAE METT guidance, compiled by Ditjen KSDAE; individual assessors not named. Overall value only, printed under a Nilai % header. Scanned table read at 300 dpi.
Scale: Published overall Nilai METT index (Indonesian national METT adaptation) from a Ditjen KSDAE decree annex or an official Ditjen KSDAE statistics or performance report table. Component scores not retained; no conversion to other METT variants. Source: Dit KK report on management-effectiveness results 2015 to 2019; Rekap Nilai annex (PDF p. 57), row Lorentz, column 2019. Retrieved 2026-10-05. Unit name and function (taman nasional (TN)) match the cohort entity; one row per unit.
Sources checked for this area:
IUCN: IUCN World Heritage Outlook: Lorentz National Park. Overall PROTECTION and MANAGEMENT and assessment year checked directly.
Direktorat Jenderal KSDAE, Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan (Indonesia): Penetapan Nilai Efektivitas Pengelolaan Kawasan Suaka Alam, Kawasan Pelestarian Alam dan Taman Buru Tahun 2017 (397 KK), Ditjen KSDAE values file (unsigned; decree number not established). Annex row for TN Lorentz read directly.
Direktorat Jenderal KSDAE (Indonesia): Laporan Kinerja 2018, Direktorat Jenderal KSDAE. Not in the list of units that reached index 70 by 2018; list gives no value for other units.
UNESCO World Heritage Centre: UNESCO World Heritage Convention: Indonesia (State Party page). Inscribed natural property confirmed on the State Party list.
Direktorat Kawasan Konservasi, Ditjen KSDAE (Indonesia): Laporan Akhir Pencapaian Kinerja Peningkatan Efektivitas Pengelolaan Kawasan Konservasi 2015-2019. Row for TN Lorentz read directly; counted.
Direktorat Jenderal KSDAE (Indonesia): Statistik Direktorat Jenderal KSDAE Tahun 2022. Unit not in the 2022 table (not scored that year).
Direktorat Jenderal KSDAE (Indonesia): Statistik Direktorat Jenderal KSDAE Tahun 2023. Unit not in the 2023 table (not scored that year).
Direktorat Jenderal KSDAE (Indonesia): SK.4/KSDAE/KK/KSA.1/1/2022, Penetapan Nilai Efektivitas Pengelolaan Kawasan Konservasi sampai dengan Tahun 2021. Base Line 2021 value read, but the decree gives the latest value up to 2021 without its assessment year; not counted.
Direktorat Jenderal KSDAE (Indonesia): Statistik Direktorat Jenderal KSDAE Tahun 2024. 2024 table carries earlier values forward, so the assessment year of its value cannot be read; not counted.
Direktorat Jenderal KSDAE (Indonesia): Laporan Kinerja Direktorat Jenderal KSDAE Tahun 2017. Establishes that SK.506/KSDAE/SET/KSA.1/12/2017 set the METT target list, not the 2017 values; no score used.
Retrieved 2026-10-05. A park with no rating here may still have one that was not found or could not be cited from a primary document.
246.8 million tonnes of carbon inside the boundary is irrecoverable: if it were lost, it could not be recovered by 2050.
No forest-loss figure is published for this area: too little forest in 2000 for a loss rate to be meaningful.
Canopy’s PACE management score, its country readiness score (C-RISK) and its weekly satellite feeds cover African protected areas today. They have not been published for this area.
| WDPA id | 1500 |
|---|---|
| Canopy Global 1000 list | September 2026 edition |
| Boundary and area source | WDPA-Jun2026 |
| Forest source | Hansen Global Forest Change v1.12 |
| Carbon source | Noon et al. (2022) |
| Canonical URL | https://canopyconservation.com/park/lorentz |
UNEP-WCMC and IUCN (2026), Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) [June 2026], Cambridge, UK: UNEP-WCMC and IUCN. Available at: www.protectedplanet.net.
Hansen, M. C. et al. (2013), High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change, Science 342: 850-853. Data: Global Forest Change 2000 to 2024, v1.12, University of Maryland, CC BY 4.0.
Noon, M. L. et al. (2022), Mapping the irrecoverable carbon in Earth’s ecosystems, Nature Sustainability 5: 37-46, doi:10.1038/s41893-021-00803-6.
How the Canopy Global 1000 is built: the method is available to signed-in readers; ask for access.
If you manage or work with this protected area and something here is wrong or out of date, tell us. Every correction is reviewed.
Everything here is free to use. The one condition is attribution.
Canopy (2026). Lorentz, Indonesia: Canopy Global 1000 rank 108 without plants, 35 with plants. Canopy Conservation, September 2026 edition. Retrieved from https://canopyconservation.com/park/lorentz
https://canopyconservation.com/park/lorentz
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Reuse, redistribute and build on this, commercially or not, as long as Canopy is credited and the licence is named.